Locations of visitors to this page.
The map is reset each June.
Click on map to register your location.
Compare cluster to Earth lights...
If the Disc is Ours
by David Sadler
|David Sadler For Congress (2002)|
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep man in everlasting ignorance. That principle is condemnation before investigation."
If the Disc is Ours
by David Sadler
In 1966, I was about to enter the 8th grade. My friend and I were in the back seat of his family car. His mother was driving west on Illinois Highway 14 between McLeansboro and Benton, Illinois. It was about 9 or 10 PM. The summer's night was clear.
About 6 miles west of McLeansboro, my friend began yelling for me to look. I was sitting next to the window on the passenger side of the car. I looked to the northwest and what I saw was an oval disc sitting nearly on top of Pleasant Grove Church which sits north of Hwy 14.
The disc was all one color - yellow. There were no other lights or colors. The color radiated like a glow from a solid object with a very distinct and defined shape. The light did not pulsate, but remained steady.
We began yelling for his mom to stop the car, but she didn't. My eyes were glued to the object hovering not more than 10 to 20 feet above the church. As the car continued traveling west, we were now in front of the church - about 100 feet away. (We went back a couple of years ago as grown men. We stepped off the distance and talked about the event.) We turned our heads around and looked back northeast as the car sped west. At all times the object remained over the church and maintained the shape and color described.
We lost sight of the disc when a large group of trees 'a woods' blocked our line of sight. His mom finally turned around just as soon as we lost sight of the object. It took maybe 20 seconds for her to slow down, turn around and edge back out to reestablish our line of sight with the church. The object was no where in sight.
As soon as we arrived at his house, I called by phone and reported the sighting to our local county sheriff in Hamilton County Illinois. The deputy did not want to take the report, but I insisted.
That was nearly 36 years ago. I've never seen anything like that before or since. I've been to air shows and military bases. I have flown private and commercial. I've read everything from Aviation Week to Popular Science and Mechanics. I have been an avid fan of the space program until the last few years. The only place I've seen anything similar is in some of the UFO books and videos that I have seen since beginning my investigations into just exactly what it was that my friend and I witnessed.
While I can describe what I saw, I can not say what it was, but I have formed some conclusions over the years.
If the disc is ours, it was completely unconventional both then and now. It would represent an entirely new paradigm in aviation.
If the disc is ours, the fact that it exists is not and has not been kept a secret. As I have learned in my study of the phenomena, sightings have occurred regularly for decades if not hundreds or even thousands of years. Artwork [ 1 ] [ 2 ]   depicts UFOs thousands of years ago.
If the disc is ours, it has not been acknowledged as we have acknowledged the stealth fighter and bomber. It has not been used like we used the atomic bomb and the stealth.
So I have some questions that I am beginning to become very impatient about having answered.
If the disc is ours, why did we build Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, the Redstone and the Saturn? Why did we build the Shuttle? Why are we building the international space station? Why do we have a space plane on the drawing boards?
If the disc is ours, why are we still burning fossil fuels and playing deadly games with nuclear power plants? Why are we going to war over energy?
If the disc is ours, and no attempt has been made to hide it from the populous, why are people's careers and reputations ruined and lives sometimes lost for reporting a sighting?
If the disc is ours, why did the NRO (National Reconnaissance Organization) historian disclose in a Popular Mechanics report that the CIA began deceiving the American public in the early 1950s to make them believe Earth was being visited by space beings? [ The CIA's Secret UFO Files, Popular Mechanics, November 1997 issue ] See my letter to the editor of Popular Mechanics regarding this article. Our government has manipulated the 'news' for decades to distract and condition the American people. Unclassified CIA documents show how this disinformation works, even using fabricated UFO stories.
If the disc is ours, who has it? The USAF, the Navy, a ‘shadow government’ unelected and unaccountable to the citizens of the United States as some have proposed - who? And what are they doing with it?
If the disc is ours, why am I not flying a commercial disc instead of a noisy and slow jetliner?
If the disc is ours, why not admit it and show it at air shows?
EARTH IS NOT FLAT - GET OVER IT
Something very strange is going on here. The reality of it is too important to not be taken seriously. It doesn't take more than a few well directed research hours to discover that these phenomena are real. The only questions remaining are who, what, where, how and why.
Those who deny UFO reality, for whatever reason, are irrelevant to answering these questions. That apathy has direct consequences because these questions go far beyond UFO reality. These questions lead directly to a determination of how democratic our Democracy, our Republic, actually is. These questions, some answers and some solutions will be covered in a later chapter.
Once a person experiences a reality, the uniformed opinion of others who have not experienced it is of very little value. Such denial apart from the facts does not change reality. The truth is, there is a lot we don't yet know about Earth, our cosmos and ourselves. One would think that in this day and age and having available to us history's lesson of Galileo, his telescope and the Church, that we would not be afraid to look through the telescope in the twenty-first century. But we are.
Such naive, uninformed denial of UFO reality does nothing to discover the true nature of life. It does nothing to advance knowledge for our own direct economic and technological benefit. To conduct the study necessary to progress socially and politically, we must do as Admiral Lord Hill-Norton, former British Chief of Defense, says and, "... find out who they are, where they come from, and what they want." But beyond that, we need to conduct the science necessary to progress economically and technologically. We need to find out what UFOs are made of, how they are constructed and how they work. We need to know what energy systems they use and how those technologies can be adapted to the energy needs of human societies.
IGNORANCE, PROGRAMMING & SECRECY
With important questions such as these outstanding, derision from the uninformed and those protecting the secret only reinforces the understanding that the American people have been programmed. Our minds have been conditioned. We have been brain-washed. Just as our forces pacifed the Vietnamese people during the Vietnam war, we ourselves have been pacified on this and many other subjects. Vice-Admiral R.H. Hillenkoetter, Pacific Commander of Intelligence in W.W. II and later Director of the CIA pointed this out when he said, "Behind the scenes, high-ranking Air Force officers are soberly concerned about the UFOs. But through official secrecy and ridicule, many citizens are led to believe the unknown flying objects are nonsense." It can't be said any more clear than that.
Such a blissful acceptance of such a psychological operations program prevents us from officially acknowledging this reality. Withholding official acknowledgement does not invalidate the reality but does prevent our open society from conducting science, sociology and history on the phenomena. This refutes every principle of a people founded upon truth, knowledge and self-government. The inquisitive and responsible person would ask, "Why are we being deceived on this issue by our government?" Such a state of ignorance about such available technology and our collective reality can not be good for a society. A people in control of their government would demand and get answers. A people controlled by their government would be ridiculed and 'pacified.'
Someone is benefiting from the study of these phenomena, and that someone are the groups that have co-opted UFO study. They enforce control and fund the study by illegally co-opting US taxpayer funded institutions, departments, agencies and black operations. The hi-jacking of this subject by these groups is illegal and extra-constitutional. In short, these people are criminals, stealing funds from the public treasury, illegally directing US government instruments and institutions and hoarding scientific and cultural knowledge that has direct benefit potential to the American people. More on this in a latter chapter.
We are at a turning point on this planet. We need answers to critical and basic questions. We need solutions to critical and basic human needs. We need to be free of those who would control and exploit this knowledge and technology for their own proprietary interest. We need to find out who has co-opted this technology illegally and unconstitutionally. They need to be prosecuted and jailed, while we release this technology to the public domain, just as fire and the wheel are basic technologies in the public domain. Then we can free ourselves from the energy grid and the control it has over people everywhere.
I no longer support our US space program because of the way this issue has been treated by the 'civilian' space agency and our government. I visited Johnson Space Center in Houston and saw nothing there that was any more real than the disc my friend and I saw hovering above Pleasant Grove Church. For my government's agencies to say there is nothing to it, is a slap in the face to tens if not hundreds of thousands of honest and educated voting citizens who have observed these objects at distances close enough to throw a rock and hit them.
Both of us had an immediate visceral certainty that the object we observed was a material object. This first impression has been reinforced by my research into the subject. However, the UFO phenomena at large holds many possibilities, since the attributes of all unexplained sightings fall into several distinct categories. Because of this, it is absurd to try to gather all sighted objects into the same category when being asked to speculate on what they are; where do they come from; who is piloting them. I certainly have no firm answers.
Where do they come from?
I am not so certain that these craft have to come from far away in our galaxy or the universe. While I don’t know anything about this for certain, there are many possibilities surrounding these phenomena including but not limited to:
1) The craft could come from another dimension that occupies the same ‘space’ as our dimension. They simply enter and exit our dimension at will.
2) The craft could be native or indigenous to Earth. This is their home (or exile), just as it is our home.
3) The craft could come from various distances away from Earth. Any argument that the craft can’t get from there to here because of Einstein is laughable simply because the limitations established by Einstein are already beginning to fall apart in laboratories and observatories around the world. Scientists have now slowed light to a few miles per hour, stopped it dead in its tracks and started it up again. We really don’t yet know the structure of the atom, or the distance to the quasars and far off stars and galaxies. We still don’t know if there is an edge to the universe. We still can’t predict which planets will have a magnetic field and which planets won’t. We still can not extract energy from the air even though we are literally swimming in energy. We are still trying to harness the power of fusion while we continue to roll the dice with fission. These news stories are in the mainstream press. The point is, we don't have it all figured out yet, so anything is possible.
What are they?
Most assuredly, a portion of UFOs are material objects, but.the body of evidence indicates strongly that not all UFOs are 'nuts & bolts.'
1) Perhaps a portion of UFOs are manifestations of energies and natural physics we have not yet categorized.
2) Perhaps a portion of UFOs are biological.
3) Perhaps a portion of these phenomena are spiritual? Perhaps this portion is a direct observance of a part of the spiritual reality that we as Christians say we believe in. See Chuck Missler’s 'Alien Encounters' for one Christian's look at the UFO issue. See also Patrick Cooke's "The Greatest Deception" for a painstaking compilation of probable Biblical UFO references and a very interesting categorization of Biblical beings and technologies. All citations are referenced by chapter and verse.
The probability is that the authentic disc isn't ours, in which case, it is a legitimate question to ask, "Who's is it?" And, "Why do they seem to violate our airspace with impunity?"
Many persons involved in defense and intelligence are quoted at the beginning of this chapter. They seem to think that a portion of UFOs are not ours. If the reader disagrees, perhaps the reader should take it up with those being quoted.
Highly recommended is the on-line book 'The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects' by Edward Ruppelt. Ruppelt was the head of the U.S. Air Force Project Blue Book. Ruppelt wrote the truth about the threat assessment of Project Blue Book immediately upon leaving the position of official USAF UFO debunker.
We often hear that Christianity would be destroyed if we were to discover an ‘alien’ race of extraterrestrials. I am proof that not all Christians would be so destroyed.
Some brothers and sisters in Christ witness to non-believers and tell them how God has spoken to them. I don’t know that God has ever spoken to me in such a way that I knew without a doubt that it was God speaking. But I do know one thing, and that is that I have seen a UFO as big as a church from 100 feet away.
My friend and I are grown men now. We have lived half a century. We each own our own businesses. We have families. We’ve never been in trouble with the law, and we have never had mental problems that would suggest that what we saw was an illusion or figment of our imaginations.
Any denial that the craft are here is made in direct opposition to the mountain of credible and tangible evidence that they are, and most importantly to me, in direct opposition to the fact that I have seen one with my own eyes. That experience molded my perception of the world and made me very skeptical of authority figures and the mainstream press telling me what is true and what is false.
Evolutionists need to know the truth about the impossibility of the random and undirected evolution of life. They need to know the truth about the fossil record. They need to hear the truth about how little we know about the earth, moon, solar system, galaxy and cosmos.
On the other hand, Christians need to know the truth about UFOs. Those who design, build and pilot them are as much a part of God’s creation as Earth and Humankind. They are as real as the screen upon which you are reading these words.
* * * end * * *
November 25, 1997
Mr. Joe Oldham, editor-in-chief
224 W. 57TH St.
New York, NY 10019
Dear Mr. Oldham:
This is a request for permission to copy and distribute Jim Wilson's article The CIA's Secret UFO Files (Popular Mechanics November 1997).
With your permission, I will see that targeted Senators, Representatives and general media get a copy of the article. Do I have your permission to copy and distribute? (While I was in dialogue with PM science/technology editor Jim Wilson concerning his article, PM never responded to my request for the rights requested.)
I doubt anyone will get excited about this, but if they do, I hope PM will report the consequences of the American government deceiving the American public for any reason. Secrecy and blind alleys is one thing, but deception on this scale is another matter.
I realize the following letter is much longer than those PM normally prints in the letters-to-the-editor section, but I would ask that an exception be made in this case. Because I believe the evidence for reprisals surrounding this subject are real, I would ask that my name and address be withheld and not divulged to anyone for any reason. Please print the following letter-to-the-editor.
November 25, 1997
Mr. Joe Oldham, editor-in-chief
224 W. 57TH St.
New York, NY 10019
Jim Wilson’s article The CIA's Secret UFO Files (Popular Mechanics November 25, 1997) may be one of the most remarkable articles on the UFO phenomena to come along in a while. The casual manner in which NRO historian, Gerald K. Haines, states the CIA was involved in the nation-wide deception of the American people that rendered the society vulnerable to Soviet exploitation and domestic reprisal is the stuff that congressional hearings and documentaries are made of.
The statements that 'The government kept the UFO myth alive…,' and 'the United States had a serious reason for wanting the public to keep believing that the strange lights in the sky were of unearthly origin,' sends chills up my spine. Is the government also involved in the well-documented and tangible cattle mutilations that have come to be associated with the UFO phenomena? How far will the government go to '[keep] the UFO myth alive?' (1)
I am concerned about the political and social implications of the UFO phenomena including but not limited to:
- the deliberate deception and psychological manipulation of the American people by U.S. agencies in such a momentous way as to damage the sanity and religious beliefs of the people,UFOs are by themselves a far-fetched issue. Even those who report having seen one have difficulty believing they are 'alien.' But I see little legitimate purpose for the government to deceive on one hand and debunk on the other especially when both the deceiving and the debunking have such grave consequences.
I hope that Mr. Haines can point to the people and programs both in the CIA and the Air Force who conducted and condoned this outrageous assault on the sanity and religious beliefs of the very people they are sworn to protect and the very people who fund said organizations' evidently misguided activities.
Du Quoin, IL
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Van Flandern, MetaReserch
To: David Sadler
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: RE: Speed of Gravity
In our latest publication about the 'speed of gravity' ['Experimental Repeal of the Speed Limit for Gravitational, Electrodynamic, and Quantum Field Interactions', T. Van Flandern and J.P. Vigier, Found.Phys. 32(#7), 1031-1068 (2002)], we show that there is no need to 'get around' special relativity (SR) because that theory is now falsified in favor of Lorentzian relativity (LR). For your purposes, this means the universe has no speed limit.
The closest approximation online is the preprint 'The speed of gravity – Repeal of the speed limit' at http://metaresearch.org/cosmology/gravity/speed_limit.asp.
Physics has recognized for the past two decades that rest masses of moving bodies do not change. The apparent increase in inertia can as easily be explained as the problem that forces propagating at a speed s in some rest frame cannot possibly propel any mass faster than s, the speed of the force. Because electromagnetic forces are, quite naturally, limited by the speed of light c, so is the resultant speed they can induce (s < c). However, gravitational force and also Coulomb force [ 1 - 2 ] propagate faster than light (s > c), and therefore would have no problem in principle propelling bodies faster than light in forward time. (Time reversal is a feature of SR, not LR, and therefore does not come into play.)
In short, the 'universal speed limit' has been repealed.
----- SPEED OF LIGHT -----
Variable Speed of Light Theories and related articles
As unbelievable as it sounds, 21st century science still does not know what an electron and photon are or from where they derive their energy source. Are they particles or waves or something else? How can a photon speed back up after it has been slowed down by a medium more dense than the vacuum of space? These are starter questions to get a person going on this adventure to discover the true nature of electrons, photons and light.
• "Opticks or, a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections, and Colours of Light" by Sir Isaac Newton
• New varying speed of light theories / Jo˜ao Magueijo, The Blackett Laboratory,Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, South Kensington, London SW7 2BZ, UK
• web search: VSL Variable Speed of Light Theories
• LIGHT SLOWED IN FREE SPACE:
| Scientists slow down the speed of light travelling in free space / Science Daily
"The work demonstrates that, after passing the light beam through a mask, photons move more slowly through space. Crucially, this is very different to the slowing effect of passing light through a medium such as glass or water, where the light is only slowed during the time it is passing through the material -- it returns to the speed of light after it comes out the other side. The effect of passing the light through the mask is to limit the top speed at which the photons can travel."| Spatially structured photons that travel in free space slower than the speed of light / Science Mag
| Full Paper: Spatially structured photons that travel in free space slower than the speed of light (pdf)
• Physicists Slow Speed of Light / HARVARD GAZETTE ARCHIVES
• 'We have broken speed of light' [superluminal quantum tunneling] / Telegraph.co.uk
• Experiments related to superluminal quantum tunneling - Günter Nimtz / wikipedia.org
• web search: Gunter Nimtz Alfons Stahlhofen University of Koblenz speed of light
(1) 2003.09.10: Several governors of western states offered monetary rewards for apprehension of the perpetrators, but no one was ever caught. Cattlemen in these states were losing cattle and started shooting at helicopters flying over their property. Cattle mutilations have continued even to this day. Argentina is in the middle of a huge wave of cattle mutilations. Along with cattle mutilations, crop circles or crop glyphs are often associated with UFO activity. Authentic crop glyphs exhibit unusual scientific properties that cannot be explained away as the actions of pranksters with boards on their feet.
Aerial photograph © 2003 by Richard Harvey and Summer Garland
Hackpen Hill, near Winterbourne Bassett, Wiltshire, England
(2) 2004.02.03: " A team of Russian and American scientists are reporting today [2004.02.01] that they have created two new chemical elements ... The team, made up of scientists from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California and the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia, is disclosing its findings in a paper being published today in Physical Review C, a leading chemistry journal. The paper was reviewed by scientific peers outside the research group before publication ... the new element bear[s] the atomic number 115, which had never been seen before. Within a fraction of a second, the four atoms of Element 115 decayed radioactively to an element with 113 protons.
-- Uut and Uup Add Their Atomic Mass to Periodic Table (element 115), NY Times, February 1, 2004 --
(3) The Bob Lazar site was taken down mere days after we posted our story on Edward Teller's death in which we linked several times to the Lazar site. Go here to see a copy of the Lazar site saying it is down due to hack attacks and for an email failure message received by me when trying to contact the webmaster of boblazar.com. (dss 2003.10.26)
Edward Teller Dies
"Edward Teller, a member of the Manhattan Project that created the first atomic bomb and who later emerged as the foremost champion of the vastly more destructive hydrogen bomb, has died. He was 95."
• Interviewer: Is there any other type of nuclear reaction other than fission and fusion that you know of?
• Teller: You try to explore the things about which I have already tried to tell you. It is a waste of time. It is, in my opinion, not interesting. I don’t intend to answer it. If you ask me that question on camera, I will shut up. I will sit silent. You are not going to get an answer out of me on that.
• Interviewer: And if I ask you on camera if you know Bob Lazar, can you just say, ‘No’?
• Teller: I will sit silently.
-- Edward Teller in an interview that may be viewed on the video 'UFO Files: How Do UFOs Fly' being asked to confirm Bob Lazar’s contention that there is another type of gravity (Gravity A) produced from an element not native to earth (element 115) but found in the gravity drive systems of captured UFOs. Of course Teller knew Bob Lazar. Teller helped Lazar get his job at S4. --
UPDATE: The Bob Lazar website has not been responding for the last day. Links to his site will fail. They were working when we posted this article.
• 2003.09.10 •
• Edward Teller dies at 95
• Edward Teller: My brush with greatness / Rick Sincere
Image enhancement by Dave Powelson, Blackbird Co.
Question: Who's on Mars, or isn't this a geodesic dome?
The object in this Mars crater is hundreds of feet in diameter.
MGS-MOC image: m1501228a
Source website: U.S. Geological Survey
Section: PDS Mars Global Surveyor Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) Image Collection
Page: Mars Global Surveyor MOC Image m1501228 - Browse Page
Stereo pairs with anylsis here.
Related article: The Craters Are Electric by Michael Goodspeed.
Of special interest is Michael's treatment of domed craters.
Note that none of Dr. C. J. Ransom's lab craters exhibit
the textured structure of m1501228a.
Image enhancement by Dave Powelson, Blackbird Co.
What is this on the surface of Mars?
NASA calls this a dune.
Question: Who's NASA kidding? What is this?
This object is thousands of feet in length.
MGS-MOC image: m1501228b
Source website: U.S. Geological Survey
Section: PDS Mars Global Surveyor Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) Image Collection
Page: Mars Global Surveyor MOC Image m1501228 - Browse Page
A comparison of 'tube/dunes' can be seen here.
Stereo pairs with anylsis here.
Portal page here.
Art in the fields
Say what you want about crop circles or glyphs, but many are beautiful and extraordinary works of art. I'll not engage in the debate as to Who/What and Why, however, it is disturbing that farmers' crops are being destroyed. This makes it a crime, and those responsible should be dealt with accordingly, if they can be caught!
US Airspace Security
Therefore, there must be pilots onboard or elsewhere.
If they are not us, then they are 'them.'
Image can not be verified but matches many
UFO pilot descriptions called Grays
Links to recommended sites...
• Disclosure Project
• UFO symbology in the bible // Bible UFO
• UFO symbology by verse and characteristic // Bible UFO
• Best UFO Info and Research Resources [New Site] [Old Site]
• Beings of the Bible // Bible UFO
• BLT Research Team, Inc // crop glyph research - Nancy Talbott
• Bob Lazar
• Halton C. Arp / official site
• HBCC Research
• ICAR (International Center for Abduction Research) / David M. Jacobs
• Military Resource Guide
• Richard Sauder's websites On Keyhole Publishing // The Sauder Zone? Richard Sauder documents underground tunneling machines on this website as a companion to his book, Underground Bases & Tunnels. That was okay, but things began going bad for Sauder when he published Kundalini Tales. Why?
• Robbins Tunnel Boring Machines / From the site, "Robbins TBM designs have been proven on hundreds of projects for more than five decades."
• Stephen J. Crothers falsifies 'The Black Hole, the Big Bang, and Modern Physics'
• The Presidents UFO Website
• US Naval Historical Center
• UFO Casebook
• UFO Evidence
• Xenotech Research / Mars fossils and surface water documented
• Clark C. McClelland, former Space Shuttle ScO, discloses his first-hand knowledge of ETs / article / website
NUKES & UFOs
• The Missing Times / Media communications and control study dealing with UFO suppression in mainstream news.
• A Narrative of UFO Events At Minot AFB / 24 October 1968 - Minot AFB, North Dakota
• It's a Small World / David Schindele, Captain, USAF Retired Reserve
• On breaking 40 years of silence / De Void, Herald Tribune
• Earth (Seasonal / At Night / Blue Marble (Index / Pic of the Day))
• Testors 1/48 Area 51 UFO, previewed by Greg Ewald
Links to recommended books & articles ...
• Alien Encounters / Chuck Missler, one Christian's look at the UFO issue. Missler does an outstanding job demonstrating the magnitude of the UFO issue making the point that to ignore it, considering the implications, is naive. He does this quietly and methodically so his audience (mostly Christians) will be willing to listen to the entire presentation. Once finished, the reader can no longer simply wave the UFO question away as rubbish or as unimportant to their world-view. Missler gently forces the reluctant, and perhaps, fearful reader to finish the material and consider the implications.
• An Alien Harvest / Linda Moulton Howe, cattle mutilations in western states. This is Howe's best work. She told me she migrated to crop glyphs and away from mutilations because she simply tired of hovering over dead animals, but Howe is responsible for bringing awareness of cattle mutilations into the mainstream, and her work is superb. Many high resolution photos in the field and in the lab will demonstrate to any skeptic that these cuts/incisions are not the work of predators or pranksters. How this relates to UFOs is still uncertain and unproven although her work shows a relationship. The point is, if not UFO related, who then, and why?
• Declaration of Principles Concerning Activities Following the Detection of Extraterrestrial Intelligence / SETI Institute, The official, government funded agencies and organizations like to be paid tax-payer dollars to look for life off Earth and create reports and protocols on how to respond if we encounter such life, but they are steadfast against considering the evidence in the here and now that this life off Earth already exists and that the evidence (radar, FLIR, visual, photographic and physical trace) is available.
• Mystery Stalks the Prairie: / Donovan and Wolverton, An early work by local law enforcement regarding cattle mutilations in western states. ([PDF] [HTML])
• Secrets In The Fields // Freddy Silva (crop glyphs). Silva has done an outstanding job reporting the facts and only the facts. Here are the facts. You make the call -- Guys with boards on their feet or something much more interesting and important?
• The Flying Saucers Are Real // Major Donald Keyhoe (on line), Keyhoe was an early giant in UFOlogy. Reading his books is reading the history of UFOs from the point of view of government, military and intelligence agencies as well as private sector efforts (NICAP) to discover the nature, magnitude and intent of the UFO phenomena. Read all of Keyhoe's books if you can find them. Discover from his personal experience how UFO existence and technology has been classified top secret from the very beginning, all the while being ridiculed and suppressed in the public domain.
• Dark Matter, Missing Planets and New Comets: Paradoxes Resolved, Origins Illuminated / Tom Van Flandern, MetaResearch: Flandern has a mind that is unencumbered by culture, mores, taboos, and, above all, mainstream politically correct science. He thinks anew starting with a clean sheet listing simple and repeatable observations. He then applies Occam's Razor to construct his models and conclusions. Gravity is faster, much faster, than light. Gravity pushes instead of attracts. "The push of gravity." Reading Flandern is exhilarating and liberating and enlightening as overly complex physical and cosmological models are destroyed and replaced by more simple models that explain the same observations in a much more logical, reasonable and demonstrable context.
• Quasars: Near vs. Far / Tom Van Flandern (on line): Simple observations of quasars lead to simple and world-view altering conclusions about cosmology once the complex web of official science deceit is wiped away. Do you care what you were taught or what you children might be learning in government school is a lie? This is a short chart comparing the simple view of quasars with the complex, mind-bending view offered by official science. Read it then you decide what should be taught in our schools.
Here is an example of the 'mainstream' official view of quasars inspite of direct, falsifying evidense.
quasar 3C 273
image: Einstein Observatory
Here is the media lie. "These bright beacons shine to us from the edges of the visible universe and are reminders to scientists of our universe's chaotic infancy. Quasars release more energy than hundreds of galaxies combined. The general consensus is that they are monstrous black holes in the hearts of distant galaxies. This image is of quasar 3C 273, photographed in 1979."
'Top 10 strangest things in space: From gravity waves to galactic cannibalism, outer space is out of this world,' MSNBC/MSN
The mainstream propagandized press keeps getting more bold in its lies and distortions with each passing day. Here is an article by space.com no less that actually says that quasars are black holes!
Black Holes: Millions Revealed By NASA's WISE Space Telescope / Space.com, By: Clara Moskowitz, 08/29/2012
"These black holes aren't the average tiny, dense objects created by the collapse of dead stars, but rather humongous 'supermassive' black holes that have been caught feasting on matter falling into them. Such active black holes are known as quasars, and are some of the brightest objects in the universe, because of light released by the infalling matter." -- quoted from the article --
Compare the mainstream model above with the more simple and observationally consistent alternative below regarding the birth of quasars and their red shift.
Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND)
Electrically Modified Newtonian Dynamics (E-MOND)
"Newton himself had the sense not to propose “the actual physics underlying the force of gravity.” All he did was to provide a mathematical expression describing the mysterious instantaneous tension between all matter in the universe. Einstein merely confused the question with his unreal notions of matter affecting empty space. On the other hand, the electrical concept of gravity deals with real-world physics. It uses the observation that matter (subatomic particles) under electrical stress exhibit different masses to draw attention to the fact that Newton's simple law of gravity embodies electrically variable masses. In other words, in an Electric Universe we require Electrically Modified Newtonian Dynamics, or E-MOND, to embellish the usual acronym.
"This concept applied at the atomic level also provides a simple solution to the quasar redshift puzzle. Arp and others have shown that the redshift of any object is made up of an intrinsic component and a velocity component. The velocity component is the only one recognized by mainstream astronomers. The intrinsic redshift is a property of the emitting atoms in the object. It decreases with time in discrete or quantized 'jumps.'
"Quasars appear to be ejected, deficient in electrons, from their parent active galactic nucleus (AGN). The lightweight electrons remain tangled in the AGN plasmoid for much longer than the heavier protons and uncharged neutrons. As a result, the quasar has lower initial charge polarization compared to matter on Earth and, from the principle of E-MOND, all subatomic particles in the quasar have lower masses. Therefore, the emitting atoms also have lower masses, and their radiation has lower energy. The result is the observed intrinsic redshift of atomic emissions from quasars and their relative faintness."
"Like the atom itself, the constituents of each atom - the protons, neutrons and electrons - can be viewed as resonant systems of charge, capable of exchanging electromagnetic energy for quantum jumps between stable resonant states. The quantum jumps over time to lower redshift values occur as electrons from the parent galaxy's jet arrive at the quasar and increase the quasars' charge polarization. As its mass increases, according to E-MOND, the quasar slows from its high ejection speed at 'birth,' due to conservation of momentum. When the intrinsic redshift value gets down to around z = 0.3, the quasar starts to look like a small galaxy or BL Lac object and begins to fall back toward its parent, while continuing to decrease in redshift. Eventually it becomes a companion galaxy. Arp has photos and diagrams of many such family groupings. Many can be traced to three and four generations of ejecting objects.
"In an Electric Universe, faintness together with high intrinsic redshift is a measure of youthfulness, not distance and speed of recession."
-- Wallace Thornhill, Cosmology in Crisis—Again!, thunderbolts.info, May 24, 2009 --
"Arp’s paper “Companion Galaxies on the Ends of Spiral Arms” was submitted to the prestigious Astrophysical Journal. The editor at the time, Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, scribbled his comment across the corner of Arp’s paper. In the background is Arp’s image of the large, active spiral galaxy NGC 7603 with its companion attached by a bridge of matter to a spiral arm. The redshift of the larger galaxy is 8,700 km/sec and the smaller, 17,000 km/sec. According to the redshift-distance equation, the companion galaxy should be a far-distant background object with no possible connection to NGC 7603. Since then, two small quasars with far more discordant redshifts have been found in the bridge. And in another celebrated instance, a supposedly distant quasar has been found in front of an opaque, much nearer galaxy. Credits: document image - Universe: The Cosmology Quest DVD, 2003; NGC7603 image - M. Lopez-Corredoira and C. M. Gutierrez, Two emission line objects with z > 0.2 in the optical filament apparently connecting the Seyfert galaxy NGC 7603 to its companion.
“When looking at this picture no amount of advanced academic education can substitute for good judgment; in fact it would undoubtedly be an impediment.”
—Halton Arp, Seeing Red.
"Chandrasekhar did not have the courtesy to send Arp’s paper to independent referees. Clearly, “imagination” is Chandrasekhar’s codeword for “belief” because Arp’s observation of discordant redshifts of connected objects in deep space strikes at the belief in the redshift-distance assumption. Arp’s observations show that the universe is, as Hubble thought, essentially static, ageless and infinite. The miraculous big bang never occurred. Despite all the hubris and ballyhoo, we are ignorant of how the universe came into being."
-- Wal Thornhill, Astronomy has little to celebrate in 2009!, 15 January 2009 --
• Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects / the famous USAF Condon Report (on line): The conclusion dismisses UFOs while the body of the report confirms a real phenomena are upon us. This is a US taxpayer funded report raising the possibility of UFO reality though cases contained in the report.
• Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmology and Academic Science / Halton Arp, observable evidence for near quasars directly falsifying mainstream cosmology promoted in 'scientific' journals, press and academia. All you have to do is look though a world-class telescope. See my comments regarding Tom Van Flandern's "Quasars: Near Vs. Far." They apply here except Arp lays the hard observational science and measurements on the reader. You want proof? Here it is. Would you rather continue to believe the lie? Many do. In Galileo's time, they blamed believing the lie upon the church and Christians. Who will be blamed for believing the lie today when it is mainstream official science and government schools pushing the untruth that is easily falsified by turning the pages in Arp's book of "plates" taken from world-class telescopes?
-- David Sadler --
"There is nevertheless a nagging suspicion among some astronomers, that all may not be right with the deduction, from the redshift of galaxies via the Doppler effect, that the universe is expanding. The astronomer Halton Arp has found enigmatic and disturbing cases where a galaxy and a quasar, or a pair of galaxies, that are in apparent physical association have very different redshifts ...
"... If Arp is right, the exotic mechanisms proposed to explain the energy source of distant quasars -- supernova chain reactions, supermassive black holes and the like -- would prove unnecessary. Quasars need not then be very distant. But some other exotic mechanism will be required to explain the redshift. In either case, something very strange is going on in the depths of space."
-- Carl Sagan in his book, 'Cosmos' --
• The Big Bang Never Happened / by Eric J. Lerner [website]
From the publisher, " Lerner, a plasma physicist, points out flaws in the Big Bang model and proposes an alternative theory: an eternal, self-sustaining "plasma" universe where electromagnetic fields within conducting gases provide other, simpler explanations for observed phenomena."
• "Opticks or, a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections, and Colours of Light" by Sir Isaac Newton
• The Day After Roswell / Col. Philip Corso, reverse engineering Roswell debris: Corso worked on the National Security Staff of the Eisenhower Whitehouse. He worked on tactical missile development. But at the end of his career, he writes one book on his stint as the head of the Pentagon's Foreign Technology Desk and his task to see to it that the debris from the Roswell UFO crash site is handed to the right American corporations for reverse engineering. Corso could be a disinformation officer, or he could be telling the truth as he knows it. Either way, the implications are astounding.
• The Hynek UFO report / Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Project Blue Book scientist/investigator: Hynek debunked UFOs for Project Blue Book with the authority of a 'scientist.' At the time, he worked for the government and military. Hynek originated the "swamp gas" explanation for a UFO sighting. After leaving government service, Hynek's true opinions became apparent as he devoted the rest of his life to the study of UFOs as reality. His many books are a testament to a person saying one thing while under orders and the employment of the government, and saying another thing once freed from such constraints. My copy of this book was signed by Hynek in Carbondale, Illinois as we discussed this constraint of truth while under government control. If you take government money, you say what they want you to say.
• The McDaniel Report / Stanley V. McDaniel, NASA failure to engage in science: The 'Face On Mars' controversy from the standpoint of failure to do science to confirm or disprove reasonable and logical claims of artificial structures on Mars detected by orbiting U.S. space craft.
• The Missing Times / Terry Hansen, news media complicity in the UFO cover-up. Clearly shows a controlled media using documented UFO sightings at military bases as the case study. As a communications major, I especially enjoyed and appreciated Hansen's methodical approach to proving this suppression of information leading to the inescapable conclusion that our media is controlled -- this time, suppressing UFO reality. Local news reports some facts only to disappear or be rewritten at the national level (wire service bureaus).
• The Greatest Deception // Patrick Cooke prosecutes the case that the Bible documents UFOs from beginning to end and that God/Jesus and UFOs are not strangers. Excellent compilation and organization showing verse references to UFOs, technologies and beings in the Bible. Read before rejecting. Have your Bible handy.
• The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects / Edward J. Ruppelt (on line) This book is essential UFO history. Edward J. Ruppelt is no run of the mill UFO author. Ruppelt was the first 'chief' of the USAF Project Blue Book. Upon leaving that post and the service, he wrote this book telling the world what he and the USAF really thought about, and how they handled, the UFO phenomena. Ruppelt is the person who coined the phrase 'Unidentified Flying Object' (UFO) to filter out the negative and demeaning connotations that were associated with the term 'flying saucers.' This is a serious look at the UFO question in the early days from a man at the very center of the UFO investigations by the US military. This is a most important and historic book. Isn't it interesting that Project Blue Book's first chief, Ruppelt, and its most visible and notorious staff-scientist debunker, Hynek, both were 'believers' when they left the 'project' and wrote their own books, finally telling the truth of their own opinions concerning the subject? Ruppelt is brutally honest and obviously concerned.
• UFO Cover-up: What the Government Won't Say / Lawrence Fawcett & Barry Greenwood, ICBMs & UFOs. Dovetails perfectly with Hansen's 'The Missing Times,' adding more documentation to the military base sightings in the 1960-1970 timeframe, and their subsequent suppression in mainstream media.
• UFOlogy II: Some Final Answers / James M. McCampbell (on line)
• UFOs and the National Security State: Chronology of a Coverup, 1941-1973 / Richard M. Dolan paints a big picture using nearly 300 documented military encounters with UFOs.
• Unconventional Flying Objects: A Scientific Analysis / Paul Hill, 'unofficial' UFO investigator at NASA determining how they fly. Here's the twenty-five year NASA scientist writing a book on how UFOs fly based upon his careful study of their reported flight characteristics and other evidence. Fascinating...
• Darwin's Enigma / Luther Sunderland falsifies the Evolutionists' myth concerning the fossil record as evidence for evolution. The implication is staggering. Fossils are the 'bed rock' of the evidence for evolutionists! If fossils don't prove evolution, then the foundation for Darwinian evolutionist claims crumble to dust. Begin your deprogramming regarding evolution here. Many are eager to see in UFO's a possibility that life on Earth was seeded by some extraterrestrial race of aliens, but life is so complex that it could not and can not come about by chance. The designer that created humans also created aliens and all life including the most simple of single celled life. What's more, life came first! The designer/creator had to come first in order to design and seed life throughout the universe. This is the staggering implication that you will come to appreciate when you read this book. This is the book that began my deprogramming process after graduation from a controlled public education career. It took years to accept and to understand, but the facts are there. Do not be afraid to look through the telescope and microscope. Do not be afraid to observe reality and draw your own conclusions. For whatever reason and for whatever agenda, we have all been lied to and programmed to believe the lies from early childhood. on line
• Darwin's Black Box / Michael J. Behe (Professor of Biological Sciences at Lehigh University. His Uncommon Descent blog. Darwin's Black Box has been named by National Review and World magazine as one of the 100 most important books of the 20th century. Behe introduces the concept of "irreducibly complex" biochemical systems. The complexity of the cell as exposed by modern scientific instruments and methods is shoveling dirt into the grave of Darwinian evolution. The religious dogma of Darwinian speculation and imagination can't withstand the discoveries of modern science.
"Life on earth at its most fundamental level, in its most critical components, is the product of intelligent activity. The conclusion of intelligent design flows naturally from the data itself -- not from sacred books or sectarian beliefs. Inferring that biochemical systems were designed by an intelligent agent is a humdrum process that requires no new principles of logic or science. It comes simply from the hard work that biochemistry has done over the past forty years, combined with consideration of the way in which we reach conclusions of design every day."
-- Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, By Michael J Behe, Page 193 --
"The discovery of design expands the number of factors that must be considered by science when trying to explain life. …. The possibility of design should cause researchers in biology to hesitate before claiming that a particular biological feature has been produced substantially by another mechanism, such as natural selection or transposition. Instead, detailed models should be produced to justify the assertion that a given mechanism produced a given biological feature."
-- Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, By Michael J Behe, Page 230 --
"The conclusion of intelligent design for physically interacting systems rests on the observation of highly specified, irreducible complexity -- the ordering of separate, well-fitted components to achieve a function that is beyond any of the components themselves."
-- Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, By Michael J Behe, Page 223 --
• Genetic Entropy & the Mystery of the Genome / [John Sanford] Respected Cornell geneticist rejects Darwinism says,
Modern Darwinism is built on what I will be calling “The Primary Axiom”. The Primary Axiom is that man is merely the product of random mutations plus natural selection.
• Antony Flew: One of World's Leading Atheists Now Believes in God, More or Less, Based on Scientific Evidence
AP, Dec. 9, 2004
A British philosophy professor who has been a leading champion of atheism for more than a half-century has changed his mind. He now believes in God more or less based on scientific evidence, and says so on a video released Thursday.
• Experiment with the Random Mutation Generator
"Cumulative selection is the key to all our modern explanations of life. It strings a series of acceptably lucky events (random mutations) together in a nonrandom sequence so that, at the end of the sequence, the finished product carries the illusion of being very very lucky indeed."This mutation and selection creative force of the Darwinian Evolutionists is interesting. Before life there was no life. How did mutation and selection (Primary Axiom) work on lifeless, non-reproducing clumps of whatever to build a non-living organism awaiting only the spark of life to bring it to life as the first living thing in the cosmos?
-- David Sadler --
Links to recommended videos ...
• Disclosure Project materials at this link.
• Briefing Document CD-Rom
• Disclosure-Witness DVD
• Two Hour Disclosure Witness Video
• Four Hour Disclosure Witness Video
• National Press Club Conference Video
• Genesis III documentaries of Mexico UFO wave of 1991-1995
• Masters of the Stars: The Ovnis of Mexico
• Messengers of Destiny
• Voyagers of the Sixth Sun
• STS-80 UFO clusters
• Australian UFO Wave 2006
• Australian UFO Wave
• West of the Blue Mountains, New South Wales
• Galston, NSW
• Eastern suburbs, Sydney
• Hoagland's Mars, Vol. 3: The Moon-Mars Connection
• Out of the blue
• Ufos-50 Years of Denial
• UFOs The Footage Archives - 50 Years of UFOs (Michael Hesemann): Part 1 / Part 2 / Part 3 / Part 4 / Part 5
• The Coming UFO Hoax by Bill Cooper
• Daylight Bulgarian UFO
• Thunderbolts of the Gods / online
• Buzz Aldrin talks about UFOs
• Moon Bases Photographed by Apollo by Sgt. Karl Wolf, USAF Precision Electronics Photographic Repairman
• Astronaut Gordon Cooper Films Saucer Landing:  
• UFO observed on the Moon by Italian Astronomer while adjusting focus on scope
GROWING EARTH THEORY (Alternative Tectonic Plate Theory)
The Expanding Earth Theory was proposed by Samuel Carey, founding professor of geology at the University of Tasmania. Neal Adams is a modern proponent of NOT the Expanding Earth theory but the Growing Earth theory.
"There is no subduction. No plates subduct. Subduction is unscientific and untrue ... Earth is growing, not expanding, and therein lies the past-error ... [The] answer lies in physics and not geology." -- Neal Adams
• Neal Adams:
| Neal Adams Blog
| YouTube Channel
| Conspiracy of Science - Earth is in fact growing animation / narration by Neal Adams
| Adams regarding mountain uplifts / folding: [ 1 ] [ 2 ]
| Neal Adams Video Clips / Growing Earth Consortium
| James Maxlow Video Clips / Growing Earth Consortium
• Responses to Neal Adams:
| In opposition: [ 1 / yorrike website]
| In support: Conspiracy of Science - Earth is in fact boring
• Growing Earth Discussions
| Growing Earth Consortium / Michael Netzer
| Growing Earth Knowledge Co. / presenting, "a new alternative geometric structure of a Hydrogen atom's nucleus"
| Growing Earth questions
| VIDEO: Neal Adams - The Growing Earth and Universe - Part 1
| VIDEO: Yes! The Earth is Expanding. Part 1 of 14.
• Super Continents (did they exist?)
| Continental Drift
| Plate Tectonics
| Origins of water on planet Earth
Links to related articles by David Sadler ...
• 2004.09.10 • Columbia's Sacrifice
• 2004.08.31 • We Told You So
• 2004.08.18 • Formisano's Twilight Zone: Part 2: An Official Announcement of 'Life on Mars' ... in September?
• 2004.08.10 • Formisano's Twilight Zone: Part 1: 'Ammonia by Any Other Name'
• 2004.03.19 • Ignoring Fossils On Mars
• 2004.03.15 • NASA Running Scared: Shooting the Messenger
• 2003.10.26 • If the disc is ours
Links to recommended articles by other authors ...
• The TRUE Report On Flying Saucers, 1967
• Quasars: Near vs. Far
• Intrinsic Redshifts in Quasars and Galaxies article by Halton C. Arp
• Top 30 problems with the Big Bang
• Top 10 problems with the Big Bang
• Guth’s Goof / by Stephen Smith
• Nobel Prize for Big Bang is a Fizzer / by Wal Thornhill
• The Black Hole, the Big Bang, and Modern Physics / Stephen J. Crothers
From the site: "There has been a deliberate suppression of important scientific papers by the community of physicists and astronomers concerning the black hole, beginning with the original paper by Karl Schwarzschild of 1916, evidently for vainglory, money and self-aggrandisement. I bring you free access to those papers, and others of relevance, in the hope that this fraud can be exposed and physics restored to a rational search for knowledge. The black hole has no foundation in theory whatsoever. Neither Newton's theory nor Einstein's theory predict it. In fact, both theories preclude it, contrary to what the orthodox relativists claim.
"The so-called 'Schwarzschild' solution is not due to Karl Schwarzschild at all. The experts have either not read Schwarzschild's 1916 memoir or have otherwise ignored it."
Visit Stephen Crother's website to get Schwarzschild's original paper in English. "
• Does the Universe Really Expand?
• A Flickering Black Hole
• A Dent in the Space-Time Fabric?
• Another 'Dent In The Spacetime Fabric'?
• The Madness of Black Holes
• Physics has its Principles
• Life on Mars
- Study: Martian soil may contain life / new 1976 Viking landers data analysis
On Gravity and Light
• Speed of gravity -- What the experiments say / 1st paper: Observational evidence that gravity must propagate significantly faster than light.
• Speed of gravity -- repeal of speed limit / 2nd paper: Ordinary things can travel faster than light.
• Overview of Pushing Gravity: New Perspectives on Le Sage's Theory of Gravitation / Meta Research is now making its first recommendation of a new book in three years.
• Theory of Gravity / by Nick Summers
• Gravity Awareness Experiments / by Nick Summers
• Gravity Forces / Louis Joseph Rancourt
• Extinction Shift Significant Findings / Dr. Edward Henry Dowdye, Jr.
• Possible New Properties of Gravity / Explores possible properties of faster than light gravity and reconciles ftl propagation with Relativity.
• Gravitational force vs. gravitational potential / a PowerPoint presentation illustrating the often-confusing difference between the effects of force and potential on clocks
• Papers Regarding A Fresh Look At Gravity
On Gravitational Lensing
• Gravitational lens
• Einstein ring
• Einstein Cross
Not so fast ...
"An image of the The "Einstein Cross" is shown below. NASA claims that the four small quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) flanking the central bright core of the galaxy represent only a single quasar located in the far distance directly behind the center of the galaxy - they tell us that we are not seeing four separate quasars - this is only a "mirage". The reason for their conclusion that the four small quasar images are in the deep background is that they have a vastly greater redshift value than does the central galaxy.
The "Einstein Cross", sources unknown
"Spectral analysis of the region between the quasars indicates they are connected to the galaxy by streams of hydrogen gas (plasma). This plasma has the same extremely high redshift value as do the quasars. So, what we actually have are four newly formed quasars symmetrically positioned around the active nucleus of a barred spiral galaxy. There is no mirage. No relativistic magic is needed to explain what we see happening in front of our eyes.
"Most important is the fact that for a foreground galaxy to gravitationally 'lens' a background QSO, the mass of the galaxy would have to act as if it were concentrated at the galaxy's center. We know from the difficulties associated with galactic rotation profiles that this does not occur."
Above quote taken from, The Electric Sky by Donald E. Scott, Ph.D. (Electrical Engineering).
• A Direct Interaction Between Light and Gravitation Does Not Occur / Dr. Edward Henry Dowdye, Jr.
• Does space curve? / More on the physical interpretation of relativity
• What the Global Positioning System tells us about the twin's paradox
• A primer on Lorentzian relativity / The universal speed limit is repealed. See why.
• Cassini Images Bizarre Hexagon on Saturn
On Electric Cosmology
• Plasma Resources
• Stellar Evolution
• The Electric Sky by Donald Scott:
-- Electric Cosmos (old) / The Electric Sky online
-- Electric Cosmos (new)
-- Order book: The Electric Sky
• Introduction to The Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres / by Nicholas Copericus (1473–1543)
• Access Research Network / YouTube Channel
• Detecting Design / Sean D. Pitman, M.D.
• The Geologic Column / Sean D. Pitman, M.D.
Click to enlarge
• The Cambrian Explosion: Biology's Big Bang / Stephen C. Meyer, Marcus Ross,Paul Nelson, and Paul Chien
• Inconvenient Science - The Age of Man / VIDEO
Additional items to be aware of ...
As time goes on, it will become more difficult to determine if objects witnessed directly by an observer are UFOs, ARVs, RCAs or other technologies. The critical determining factor is flight characteristics, i.e., right angle change in direction and immediate acceleration combined with other physical behavior characteristics, i.e., invisibility, sudden appearance and sudden disappearance.
Let's begin to look at some imposters and hoaxes. It's important we do this and understand there are imposters and hoaxes out there because these are used to mislead, misinform, discredit and disparage authentic UFO reality.
• Astonishing UFO Footage From Italy?: [Preface] [video]
Video Recorded Observation
Computer Generated Image (CGI) is snagging more people that I ever thought possible. It will become virtually impossible to discern CGI in the future, so photographic (still and motion) evidence in the future will become less and less reliable for all evidentiary purposes - not simply UFO reports.
• Strange Craft / video by Kris Avery, music by Drone
• CG. Motion study cross UFO/Drone 2
• CG UFO Cross above house
• UFO Big Basin CG recreation